Special

por Ricardo Baesso de Oliveira

Adler and Kardec

Alfred Adler (1870-1937) was a psychiatrist, one of the first members of the small group of physicians who met at Freud's house on Wednesday nights to discuss psychological issues. However, when the theoretical and personal differences between Adler and Freud arose, Adler abandoned Freud's circle and established an opposing theory, which became known as individual Psychology. While still a member of Freud's restricted circle, he converted to Protestantism. Although, apparently, he did not maintain deep religious convictions, nor did he explicitly refer to the dimension of the Spirit, his theory is largely identified with Spiritist principles. That is why we have decided to establish a dialogue between his ideas and Kardecian thinking.

In summary, the Adlerian theory says the following: all people are born with an innate tendency towards completeness and wholeness. Even babies have an innate drive for growth, for completeness, or for success. People, due to their nature, are continually driven by the need to overcome feelings of inferiority and are attracted by the desire for completeness. The feeling of inferiority, identified in all creatures, arises because of the fragility and dependence of the child at birth. The physical deficiencies of the individual – natural in the first years of life - activate inferiority complexes, which motivate the person to fight for superiority or success. Individuals who are not psychologically healthy struggle for personal superiority, while those who are psychologically healthy seek success for all mankind.

In his theory, Adler therefore identified two main ways of overcoming the inferiority complex. The first is the unproductive socially attempt to attain personal superiority; the second involves social interest and aims at success or perfection for all.

Some people struggle for superiority with little or no concern for others; their goals are personal and their efforts are motivated, in large part, by all that they can achieve for themselves. Assassins, thieves, crooks, family or social parasites are obvious examples of people struggling for personal gain. Some people create intelligent disguises for their personal struggle and may, consciously or unconsciously, hide their self-centered posture behind the mantle of social concern.

In contrast to people struggling for personal gain, there are those psychologically healthy individuals who are motivated by the social interest and success of all mankind. These individuals are concerned with goals that go beyond themselves, are able to help others without demanding or expecting a reward and have the ability to see others not as opponents but as people with whom they can cooperate for social benefit. Success itself is not obtained at the expense of others, but it is a natural tendency to move toward completeness and perfection.

People struggle for personal superiority or collective success to compensate for feelings of inferiority, but the way they struggle is the result of their own personality. Personality is built from raw materials provided by heredity and the environment. However, these forces are not responsible in an absolute way for people's way of thinking, feeling and acting. Personality is the product of a creative force, i.e., a person's ability to freely shape its behavior and build its own personality. Even if the creative force is influenced by the forces of heredity and the environment, it is ultimately responsible for people’s personality. The forces of nature and education can never deprive a person of being able to establish a single goal or choose a style to achieve the goal. Each person uses heredity and the environment as bricks and cement to build its personality, but the architectural design reflects that person's own style. The creative force makes each person a free individual; it is a dynamic concept that implies movement, and this movement is the most relevant feature of life. All psychic life involves movement toward a goal, movement with a direction.

And finally, a last basic principle of Adler: the value of all human activity must be seen from the point of view of social interest. Social interest is the natural condition of the human species and the bond that connects it to society. The natural inferiority of individuals needs their union to form a society. Without the protection and nourishment of a father or mother, a baby would perish. Without the protection of the family or the clan, our ancestors would have been destroyed by animals that were stronger, more ferocious or endowed with sharper senses. Social interest, therefore, is a necessity for the perpetuation of the human species and collective well-being.

Social interest was the criterion that Adler used to measure psychological health. According to him, social interest is the only scale to be used in judging a person's value. Healthy individuals are genuinely concerned about people and have a successful goal that encompasses the well-being of all.

Social interest, for Adler, is not synonymous with charity and altruism, although acts of philanthropy may be linked to social interest. A woman, recalls Adler, can regularly donate large sums of money to the poor, not because she feels in tune with them, but rather because she wants to maintain herself separated from them.

Some aspects can be highlighted in the above summary, because they surprisingly identify themselves with Spiritist ideas: the attribute of perfectibility, the basic differences in the human lifestyle, the presence of the Spirit in the construction of the personality and the principle of human solidarity as a vital necessity.

The attribute of perfectibility

In Posthumous Works one can read Kardec’s following text:

We do not know the origin and the way the Spirits were created; we only know that they are created simple and ignorant, that is, without knowledge and not knowing what is good and what is evil, but they are perfectible and with equal capacity to acquire and to know everything, in time.

We can admit from the text that the Spirit is created with three attributes: simplicity, ignorance, and perfectibility. Simple, because it is unique, formed of a single, homogeneous part. It is ignorant, because it has no experiences, and no knowledge or acquisitions. Perfect, because it is endowed with the potentiality of progress, an intimate development project, and a purpose towards more diversity. It seems to us that Adler intuitively refers to the Kardecian attribute of perfectibility in admitting an innate tendency in all creatures to completeness and wholeness. According to him, this tendency, identified in childhood with the natural fragility of the baby, gives rise to an inferiority complex that will guide his psychic life.

Life styles

Adler admits that the way in which the individual will deal with his inferiority complex will define his lifestyle and the richness (or not) of his existence, proposing two very distinct types: the self-centered, selfish, and occupied solely with his interests and the one centered on collective well-being, solidarity and altruism. This theory of two personalities at the ends of an existential spectrum is seen in Kardec:

The carnal man - more bound to the corporeal life than to the spiritual life – experiences material pains and enjoyments on Earth. His happiness consists in the fleeting satisfaction of all his desires. His soul, constantly concerned and distressed by the adversities of life, is in permanent anxiety and torture. Death scares him because he doubts the future and because he has to leave all his affections and hopes behind in this world. The moral man - who has placed himself above the false needs created by passions - in this world already experiences joys that the material man does not know. The moderation of his desires gives the Spirit calmness and serenity. Happy for the good he does, he experiences no disappointments and the inconveniences, which slide over the soul, leave no painful impression. (The Book of Spirits, item 941).

Carnal man and moral man, in the denomination of Kardec, can be metaphorically considered like the two ends of a spectrum. Among them are the vast majority of souls reincarnated on Earth.

Building personality

Adler did not define what the creative force consists of, and was criticized for it. According to critics, the term creative force is especially illusory, a magical force, that takes the raw materials of heredity and the environment and molds a unique personality. Such a concept, according to critics is simply fiction and cannot be studied in the scientific arena.

We believe that the concept of creative force is identified with the very concept of Spirit, of the Kardecian thought. Genes and environment cannot explain everything we are. In the structure of our personality we have to consider the powerful influence of the Spirit, which brings into corporeity its history, its tendencies, its likes and its inclinations.

According to the Encoder of Spiritism, the various faculties of an individual are manifestations of the same cause - the soul - i.e., the incarnate Spirit (The Book of Spirits, item 366). Since the qualities of the soul are those of the incarnated Spirit, the good man is the incarnation of a good Spirit and the evil man is that of an impure Spirit (Book of Spirits, Introduction, item VI). Kardec adds that intelligence is also an essential attribute of the Spirit and that the Spirit is reflected in the body, which is shaped by the qualities of the Spirit.

Examining the instinctive predispositions, Kardec comments that the source of the innate faculties is in the reincarnated individuality, for the soul brings, by uniting itself with the body, what it has acquired, its good or bad qualities Spiritist Magazine, 1860, page 209). The soul is the intelligent being; in it is the seat of all perceptions and sensations; it feels and thinks for itself; it is individual, distinct, perfectible, preexisting and survivable to the body (Spiritist Magazine, 1866, page 21).

Human Solidarity

Fraternity and concern for collective well-being are very strong points in Kardecian thought, as Adler thought, in presenting the concept of social interest. Kardec was emphatic in this regard. Man is worth for what he does for the benefit of his neighbor and his community. When he inquired of the Spirits about the most meritorious of all virtues, he received the following reply:

There is virtue whenever there is voluntary resistance to the dragging of bad tendencies. The sublimity of virtue, however, lies in the sacrifice of personal interest, for the good of others, without hidden thoughts. The most meritorious is the one based on the most disinterested charity. (The Book of Spirits, item 893)

 

Author's Note:

Information about Alfred Adler was taken from the book Theories of Personality, by Jess Feist, Gregory Feist and Tomi-Ann Roberts, Eighth Edition, Artmed, 2015.

 

Translation:

Eleni Frangatos - eleni.moreira@uol.com.br

 
 

     
     

O Consolador
 Revista Semanal de Divulgação Espírita