Some questions related to the concepts of beauty,
specifically considering the human form, are eventually
asked in our Spiritist studies: is there a universal
standard of beauty, in the same way there in a universal
ethical standard? Is there any relation between beauty
and intellect-moral development? To what extent are
beauty and ugliness evidence chosen by the Spirits in
the process of reincarnating? Some of these issues are
discussed in this text.
Universal beauty standard
Evolutionary psychologists claim that there is a
universal standard of beauty, defined at the beginning
of human evolution, through natural selection and sexual
selection, and that they are invariable in time and
space, that is, they arose with man and manifest
themselves in any place in the world. (1)
Obviously, we cannot disregard other factors, such as
personal and cultural factors. The idea, already
defended in 1757 by the philosopher David Hume, is
maintained that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and,
therefore, should consist of a subjective, learned and
cultural experience. Whoever loves the ugly, seems
beautiful to him, says the popular saying.
The comment of the chief of a tribe in the Xingu
Indigenous Park became famous when the community was
visited by the model Gisele Bündchen in 2006. Asked by a
reporter about the beauty of the Brazilian model, he
said:
- Too thin! No Indian here would want to marry her.
In addition to personal and cultural factors, which are
undoubtedly important, evolutionary psychologists
clarify that psychological science has identified some
transversality in the physical characteristics that
influence the perception of attractiveness. Three of
these main characteristics are symmetry, mediania
(degree of similarity with the average facial
proportions of the general population) and sexual
dimorphism (presence of facial characteristics that
typically distinguish males from females).
Individuals are expected to select long-term partners
with fertility and health indicators (youth, beauty,
waist and hip ratio). Beauty describes a healthy
appearance. Our existence as a species depends on it.
Our mind pleases signs that induce patterns of youth,
health and fertility, since from an evolutionary point
of view only one thing matters: to survive. For the
survival of the species we need to identify the best
partners. Appearance indicates reproductive quality.
Beauty is a sign of fertility and genetic quality.
Symmetry, absence of deformities, cleanliness, spotless
skin, clear eyes, intact teeth are attractive in all
cultures. Orthodontists have found that a beautiful face
has teeth and jaws in optimal alignment for chewing.
Exuberant hair always appeals, probably because it
indicates not only good health in the present, but also
a history of good health in previous years. A subtler
sign of good genes is being average in terms of the size
and shape of each part of the face. The geometry of
beauty was once an indicator of youth, health and no
prior pregnancy. Our mind has evolved in this context
and still has health detectors through beauty, although
a lot has changed.
Three-month-old babies prefer to look at a pretty face,
and looking at it, they smile more and fix their eyes
for longer periods. This strongly corroborates a concept
of beauty innate in the human species. (2)
And as for Spiritism? Does it manifest itself regarding
this issue? We did not find in the research that we
carried out for this text any targeted and broad
approach on the subject, however the considerations that
Andre Luiz presents, when examining reincarnating
planning (3), lead us towards the theory of a universal
model of beauty. Andre uses the following expressions:
the male mold showed absolute harmony of lines, like
Hellenic art with an ancient taste; the model was the
most exquisite anatomical work; that human figure was
similar to anything divine; irreproachable forms, as for
the exterior lines; less graceful exterior molds;
impeccable lines for fitness; perfect physical harmony
and bodily ugliness.
Are good and beautiful equivalent?
A common stereotype, known by science as the Hal
effect (4), represents our tendency to associate
everything that is beautiful with everything that is
good. Because of this stereotype, attractive people are
usually perceived as having a variety of positive
personality characteristics, but also as being more
competent and happy. (5)
Ordinary experience shows that this is not true.
Beautiful-looking individuals often demonstrate bad
character, while people not labeled as beautiful
demonstrate evident ethical and compassionate behavior.
But, in some way, would the intellect-moral development
be reflected in the physical expressions of the
beautiful and the ugly, considering that the physical
body is shaped by the Spirit itself, when the process of
returning to the corporeal dimension?
Kardec suggested this hypothesis in an oral
communication made at the Parisian Society of
Spiritist Studies on February 4, 1869, although such
ideas were never published by him, but posthumously.
According to the Encoder, the perfection of
the form would be the consequence of the perfection of
the Spirit; whence it can be concluded that the ideal of
form must be that which the Spirits wear in a state of
purity. And yet: real beauty consists of the form
that is most distant from animality and that best
reflects the intellectual and moral superiority of the
Spirit, which is the main being. It also adds that
the type of beauty consists of the form most appropriate
to the expression of the highest moral and intellectual
qualities and that, as man rises morally, his envelope
will become closer to the ideal of beauty, which is
angelic beauty. (6)
This statement found support in several mediumistic
communications received at the same meeting. In one of
them, an entity that signed itself as Pamphile said the
following:
You rightly thought that the primary source of all
goodness and intelligence is also the source of all
beauty. - Love generates the beauty of all things, being
perfection itself. - The Spirit must acquire this
perfection, which is its essence and its destiny. He has
to approach, by his work, sovereign intelligence and
infinite goodness; therefore, it must also cover the
increasingly perfect form, which characterizes perfect
beings.
Lavater's Spirit was also manifested (7), stating that
the connection between the good and the beautiful is a
certain and logical fact, when examined from the point
of view of the Spirit: we get closer and closer to
real beauty, as we that we rise to perfection. He
wrote: Beautiful, really beautiful is only what is
always and for everyone; and that eternal, infinite
beauty is the divine manifestation in its incessantly
varied aspects; it is God in his works and in his laws!
Here is the only absolute beauty. It is the harmony of
harmonies and is entitled to the title of absolute,
because nothing more beautiful can be conceived.
However, when referring to beauty as a manifestation of
corporeality, the author relativizes this concept,
stating that harmony, even in evil, produces beauty.
There is the beautiful satanic and the beautiful
angelic.
Emmanuel expresses an equivalent thought: Not
everything that is beautiful is holy. (8)
In conclusion, for now, we can accept that the
intellectual-moral condition of the one reincarnating
can participate in the physical traits defined in his
bodily manifestation, but many other factors intervene
in the construction of his body, as we will see below.
Beauty and ugliness as evidence
Kardec defines tests as the vicissitudes of
bodily life, by which the Spirits purify
themselves, according to the way in which they support
them. (9) Beauty and ugliness, when significant, are
considered evidence because they have direct
implications for the experiences of the reincarnated
Spirit. Many studies in social psychology have shown
that handsome men and women begin their professional
lives with higher salaries, and beautiful women receive
less punishment when judged for a crime committed.
Taller men advance more quickly in companies than short
ones.
Andre Luiz reports on the theme by examining the
dynamics of the return of the Spirit to the physical
dimension, relating entities that, in the organization
of the chromosomal maps that will define their future
shape, are concerned with issues related to physical
appearance and he states that the anatomical contours
of the physical shape, deformed or perfect, long or
short, beautiful or ugly, are part of the educational
statutes. (10)
According to Andre Luiz, several factors are added when
defining the physical appearance of an individual. When
describing Sigismund’s reincarnation, he comments:
[...] the anatomical contours and details will develop
according to the principles of balance and the law of
heredity. The future physical form of our friend
Sigismund will depend on the paternal and maternal
chromosomes; add, however, to this primordial factor the
influence of Raquel's mental molds, the performance of
the interested person, the contest of the Constructing
Spirits, who will act as employees of the divine nature,
invisible to the terrestrial gaze, the affectionate
assistance of the friendly entities who will constantly
visit the reincarnating, in the months of formation of
the new body, and will be able to have an idea of how
his physical temple will be like.
(11)
Thus, didactically, we can relate the subject's physical
appearance to the following factors:
a) Heredity.
According to Andre: Heredity works with inalienable
dominance over all evolving beings. Fetal modeling and
embryo development obey natural physical laws, which
occurs in the organization of forms in other kingdoms of
Nature. The organism of the unborn, in its densest
expression, comes from the body of the parents, who
entertain their lives and create their characters with
their own blood. (12)
b) Psychism of the reincarnating portraying his
spiritual condition and his most pressing evolutionary
needs and the mother's psyche, in close connection with
the mind of the fetus.
Andre writes: Heredity, which is accepted in the
scientific knowledge of the world, has its limits [...]
the parents provide certain resources to the
reincarnating Spirit, but these resources are
conditioned to the needs of the soul that benefits from
their cooperation, because, deep down, we are
heirs of ourselves. (13)
Examining Julio's reincarnation, Andre comments: During
Zulmira's pregnancy, Julio's mind will remain associated
with the maternal mind, influencing, as is fair, the
formation of the embryo. The entire cellular cosmos of
the new organism will be impregnated by the forces of
thought. As we see, the command resides in the mind. The
conscience traces the destiny, and the body reflects the
soul. Every aggregation of matter obeys the Spirit's
impulses. Our thoughts fabricate the ways we use
ourselves in life. Certain intimate states of the woman
somehow reach the fetal principle, marking it for the
entire existence. Is that the work of motherhood
resembles a delicate process of modeling, requiring,
therefore, great care and harmony so that the task is
perfect. (14)
c) Interference by Spirits specialized in the
reincarnation process.
Andre Luiz comments that a large percentage of
reincarnations in the Crust are processed in a
standardized manner for all, in the field of purely
evolutionary manifestations. But another percentage does
not follow the same program. Raising the soul in
culture, knowledge and, consequently, in responsibility,
the individual reincarnation process is more complex,
evading general expression, as is logical. In view of
this, the higher spiritual colonies maintain special
services for the reincarnation of workers and
missionaries.
He also recalls that heredity works with an inalienable
dominion over all evolving beings, but naturally suffers
the influence of all those who achieve qualities
superior to the general environment. Furthermore, when
those interested in new experiences in the Crust plan
are worthy of “intercessory” services, the higher forces
can print certain changes to the matter, from
embryological activities, determining changes favorable
to the work of redemption. (15)
The theme is complex and little material on the subject
is available in the Spiritist literature. We must be
open to new considerations, which may allow, in the
future, broader and more precise reflections.
________________________
1 Manual of Evolutionary Psychology,
Yamamoto et al.
2 Steven Pinker, How the mind works.
3 Missionaries of Light, chaps 12, 13 and
14
4 The halo effect is the possibility that
the evaluation of an item, product or individual may,
under some bias, interfere in the judgment on other
important factors, contaminating the overall result. For
example, in the performance appraisal processes the halo
effect is the interference caused due to the
friendliness that the appraiser has for the person being
evaluated
5 The science of human beauty, Mariana
Carrito, in Public, 22/12/19
6 Spiritist Review, August 1869
7 Johann Kaspar Lavater (1741-1801),
besides being a pastor, was a philosopher, poet,
theologian and an enthusiast of animal magnetism in
Switzerland. He is considered the founder of
physiognomy, the art of knowing people's personality
through physiognomic traits.
8 Our Bread, Introduction
9 Practical instructions on Spiritist
manifestations, Spiritist vocabulary.
10 Missionaries of Light, ch. 13
11 Missionaries of Light, ch. 13
12 Missionaries of Light, ch. 13
13 Between Earth and Heaven, ch. 28
14 Between Earth and Heaven, ch. 28
15 Light Missionaries, ch. 13.
|