The physical sensations of hunger, pain, fear and
thirst, or moral sensations, such as anger, envy or hurt
that the Spirits say they feel, for Kardec, are very
strong impressions that the soul keeps during bodily
life and, therefore, in erraticism it preserves the more
or less strong impression of these sensations.
In an analogy, these sensations are as a tattoo
imprinted on the Spirit that, always or almost always,
will remember that mark.
All of this, incidentally, meets Kardec's idea that the
Spirit is the seat of feelings and emotions. Recent
studies - already post Kardec - on the spontaneous
memories that some children have of their past
existences confirm that it is in the Spirit that the
letters of the book of existences are written.
And these memories are so intense, they are so
“tattooed” in the Spirit that, even wearing another
physical body, the memory exists, with the most curious
details and circumstances regarding the facts that were
remarkable for the Spirit in that previous existence.
The researchers involved in this theme report that, in
general, one of the strongest memories of these children
are, precisely, the moments that involved their deaths,
especially if these deaths were due to tragic causes.
The body is already another, however, beyond the body
there is the memory that remains as a part of the soul's
biography.
It is like a book, which we read constantly, mainly the
most moving pages. The book is the Spirit, and the
memories are the written pages that, when reread, give
us the impression that we are experiencing those moments
again.
Well then...
After receiving the invitation for a lecture and
addressing the theme sensation and perception of the
Spirits, we decided to check the sensations and
perceptions not of the Spirits, but of the Mediums.
Do the Mediums feel the same sensations that the Spirits
say they feel when establishing contact?
If, for example, the Spirit reports being cold, can this
sensation be transmitted to the medium?
It is a very exciting subject to investigate what
mediums feel. Therefore, we went into the field to ask
the mediums about their sensations and perceptions in
contact with the Spirits.
Are you happy? Sad? Do you feel distress? Do you feel
pain?
We collected, in this research, with the participation
of 66 mediums, interesting observations that could give
rise to a little more robust and in-depth studies of
this agenda.
The work included 7 questions for the mediums to answer.
The first question was to check, in general, what are
the sensations that mediums feel in the mediumistic
exchange.
At this stage, the mediums reported feeling the most
diverse sensations. In all, 17 sensations were
catalogued, with emphasis on tachycardia, present in 9
responses.
It seems that, despite the many answers, there are some
common issues to at least most mediums.
Tachycardia - 9 quotes
Neck tension - 4 quotes
Cold - 4 quotes
Tingling - 3 quotes
Willingness to write – 3 quotes
Body grow – 3 quotes.
In the second question, we seek to know what mediums
feel when they establish contact with Spirits in a
situation of suffering.
Let us see below the most cited words:
Pains 14 times.
Anguish 9 times.
Fear 5 times
Anger 7 times.
Sadness 7 times
Willingness to cry 7 times.
We emphasize that the mediums, in their majority,
mentioned feeling more than one sensation. Example: body
aches, cold and anger. Or fear, anguish, anger and want
to cry.
In the third question, we intend to know the sensations
of the mediums when there is contact with a Spirit in a
healthy condition in the Spirits' world.
The most mentioned words were:
Peace -13 quotes
Tranquility - 6 quotes
Lightness – 5 quotes
As in the previous question, the mediums did not say
they only felt a sensation, but always a “combo” of
sensations, such as peace, lightness, tranquility, or
good feelings, balance, happiness.
Two mediums reported that they feel nothing, they just
see the expansion of their visual field and then, from
that, they make direct contact with these Spirits.
We divided the sensations into two groups and called
them as follows:
Physical sensations and moral sensations.
Our intention is to identify which of these sensations
causes the most impact for the medium. We naturally
place hunger, thirst and pain in general, etc. as
physical sensations.
As sensations of a moral order, we place: anger, hurt,
jealousy, anguish, envy, and so on.
In question number 4, we address physical sensations. Do
the mediums feel the physical sensations that the
Spirits say they feel?
66.2% said they felt the sensations of hunger, thirst,
pain and cold.
33.8% said they did not feel these sensations in the
mediumistic exchange.
In question 5, we went to the moral sensations, which,
as stated above, are anger, hurt, envy, jealousy,
sadness, etc.
With the sensations that we conventionally call moral we
have the following results:
81.5% of the mediums said they felt.
18.5% of the mediums reported feeling nothing.
In question 6, we seek to compare the vigor of physical
and moral sensations. In case the medium feels them,
which one would be the strongest one?
We obtained the following numbers:
78.5% reported being the strongest moral sensations.
21.5% believed that physical sensations are the most
powerful.
We still leave question number 7 for the free expression
of mediums.
We will bring, here, some reports in a much-summarized
form and that may give rise to deeper studies.
A medium says that, in the mediumistic meeting, he was
instructed to repress the aggressive behavior of a
Spirit. However, when repressing the aggressive behavior
of the Spirit, the medium fell into an unconscious
trance on three occasions and, according to him, the
Spirit manifested itself against his will. After the
three events, the medium reported that his mediumship
was suspended, and no Spirit, not even the aggressive
one, communicated again through him over the course of a
few months.
We commented that: In the process of mediumistic
exchange, Kardec always puts the protagonist in the
Spirit, leaving the medium as a supporting role, even
because, if the Spirit does not want to manifest itself,
nothing will happen, no matter how powerful the
mediumistic faculty is. Perhaps this is the case above,
the Spirits showing that they will be able to promote or
not the communications with the mediums that best offer
them conditions for this, and that they consider most
opportune at that moment.
Other reports that caught our attention regard the
medium’s feeling an expansion of his physical body: as
if the hands, feet and head were assuming, in the
mediumistic exchange, a size much larger than normal.
The opposite has also been reported, that is, the
medium's hands, feet and entire body decrease to the
point where things around him seem gigantic.
A hypothesis that we can raise for this question is the
expansion property of the perispirit, whose medium,
naturally, begins to feel in contact with the Spirits,
having the sensation that their physical organs increase
or decrease in size.
Some deductions from the answers given by the mediums:
1 – Spirits transmit their sensations to mediums and
some feel them according to the more or less advanced
degree of their mediumistic perception. This may perhaps
explain the reason why some mediums do not feel these
physical or moral effects felt by the Spirits, and the
fact that these sensations are more or less potent for
some mediums than for others.
2 – Moral sensations, such as anger, hurt; jealousy and
sadness are stronger in most mediums than physical
sensations, represented by hunger, thirst, cold and
fear. Moral sensations are, for the Spirits, a more
potent source of suffering and happiness, it is natural,
and therefore that they keep this coherence when
transmitted to the medium, and this, in turn, perceives
them more clearly and intensely than the physical
sensations.
3 – We also noticed a greater number of sensations found
in the interchange with suffering Spirits compared to
healthier Spirits. These last ones basically bring
sensations very similar to the mediums and that can be
summarized in a single word: peace.
In short, here are, in this text, some impressions about
the questionnaire that we apply to mediums. Other
annotations and perceptions of this work may appear, not
least because it is a fertile theme and still little
explored.
It may be, therefore, that this article gains more body,
more observations, being, then, enriched, or, who knows,
it may gain part 2 and 3.
|