Some
explanatory
proposals
about
evolution
have been
brought
forward.
The classic explanation
of traditional
Christianity is the creationist or fixist one,
according to which
humans, like other
animals, are as they
always have been,
without any change. This
view believes in a
creator God, who would
have originated the
world as we see it
today. No living being
“comes” from any other,
as there is no
evolution. Nobody in the
scientific community
takes this theory
seriously, as the
evidence for biological
evolution is
indisputable.
The theory that prevails
in the scientific
community states that
species evolved from
other species, and the
species that exist today
probably did not exist
at the beginning of the
world, and that
evolution takes place by
a series of random
genetic mutations and
natural selection. The
most scathing criticism
of this official theory
refers to the complexity
of certain organs, such
as the eyes of
vertebrates, and
systems, such as blood
clotting. It is almost
inconceivable that
structures like this
could have arisen by
chance.
A third possibility
seeks to reconcile the
two previous ones, the
theory of Intelligent
Design. Proponents
of Intelligent Design
stress the difficulty,
if not the
impossibility, of
explaining structures as
complex as the human eye
by means of random
mutations and natural
selection alone. They
claim that complex
structures and organs
show a creative
integration of many
different components
because they are
intelligently designed.
They leave the question
of the designer open,
but the obvious answer
is God.
The major criticism of
this theory is that
things did not always
work out. It is believed
that more than 90% of
the species that
appeared on Earth have
become extinct. Thus,
this designer would not
be as intelligent as is
believed.
A fourth hypothesis
presents itself: neither
chance nor an external
intelligence. Living
organisms can have inner
creativity, as human
beings do. New ideas
arise, nobody knows how
or why. The human being
has an inherent
creativity, and all
living organisms can
also have an inherent
creativity that
manifests itself to a
greater or lesser
extent. According to
this hypothesis,
machines require
external designers,
organisms do not.
The theory of inner
creativity goes back to
very ancient thinkers
like Erasmus Darwin
(1731-1802), the
grandfather of Charles
Darwin. He said that God
endowed life or nature
with an inherent
creative capacity that
later manifested itself
without.
The need for divine
guidance or
intervention. Living
beings were capable of
improving themselves,
and the results of the
parents' efforts were
inherited by their
descendants.
Another proponent of
this theory was Jean-Baptiste
Lamarck (1744-1829).
According to him,
animals acquired new
habits in response to
their environment and
their adaptations were
transmitted to their
descendants. An inherent
power of life produced
more and more complex
organisms, moving them
up the animal scale.
The theory of creativity
inherent in living
organisms does not hold
up in light of spiritist
postulates. Even because
creativity, intelligence
and will are attributes
not of the living
organism, but of the
spiritual principle,
which is the seat of all
this.
Accepting that the
spiritual principle, in
the evolutionary phase
of plants and animals,
and even in the human
phase, is capable of
solving problems as
complex as those arising
from its survival and
growing specialization
is illogical.
The solution to most of
these evolutionary
obstacles involves
changes in the structure
of DNA, located in
chromosomes, in the
nucleus of cells. They
are structures that are
inaccessible to the most
gifted minds, let alone
the intelligent
principle that does not
even have a mind for
most of its evolution.
Let us look at an
example when we look at
HIV's acquired
resistance to antivirals.
Let us imagine that a
new antiviral drug is
given to a certain
patient. The medicine,
after reaching the
intimacy of the cell,
will change the
environment where the
viruses are found. Thus,
we will have a new
environment, as that
chemical substance never
existed in the cell
before.
A certain genetic change
will be required so that
the virus is not
destroyed by the drug;
it needs to acquire drug
resistance. At the
genetic level, a
mutation needs to occur.
Mutation consists of a
set of specific changes
in the sequence of the
gene molecule.
For this to happen, the
virus would have to
recognize that the
environment has changed,
identify the necessary
change to adapt to the
new conditions and then
cause the correct change
in the DNA molecule,
that is, promote a
mutation. Moreover, the
virus would have to do
this in an environment
it has never experienced
before.
Even if it were possible
to imagine the
occurrence of mutations
driven by a possible
creativity of the
organism in the case of
vital resistance to
drugs, evolutionary
changes of a more
complex organ (such as
the brain or eye) would
require practically a
miracle.
The fifth proposal is
spiritist. Without
denying the proposal of
official science,
according to which
evolution takes place
through mutations and
natural selection,
Spiritism goes further
and informs that the
mutations that gave rise
to new species and the
gradual improvement of
living organisms were
often promoted by
disembodied spirits
linked to the evolution
of the planet. In this
regard, we have a vast
literature.
According to Leon
Denis, the theory of
evolution must be
completed by that of
percussion, that is, by
the action of invisible
powers, which activate
and direct this slow and
prodigious upward march.1
And yet, Denis: Chemical
spirits, physicists,
naturalists, astronomers
act everywhere on subtle
matter, which they make
undergo preparations,
modifications intended
for works that the human
imagination would have
difficulty conceiving.2
The French physician
doctor Gustavo Geley
follows the same line;
the evolution of species
is guided, to some
extent, by a superior
and profound influence.
The intermittent
appearances of the main
species and instincts
are in accordance with
environmental needs and
vital needs, obeying the
acquired purpose.
However, there is still,
everything like in the
artist's work, alongside
genius achievements,
mistakes, imperfections,
forgetfulness,
exaggerations,
attempts...3
In Chico Xavier's
mediumistic literature,
we find abundant
information that
confirms these concepts.
Emmanuel states that
just as the human
chemist finds in
hydrogen the simplest
formula to establish the
route of his substantial
comparisons, the Spirits
that cooperated with the
Christ, in the
beginnings of the
planetary organization,
found, in the
protoplasm, the starting
point for the activity
director, taking it as
the essential basis of
all living cells of the
terrestrial organism.4
Also, André Luiz:
The spiritual
architects, mingled with
celestial supervision,
would spend long
centuries preparing the
cells that would serve
as the basis for the
plant kingdom, combining
nucleoproteins with
glucids and other
primordial elements, in
order to establish a
safe level of constant
forces, among the
luggage of the nucleus
and the cytoplasm.
With such realization,
the intelligent
principle begins to
develop from the physio
psychosomatic point of
view. Not only the
physical form of the
future then promises to
reveal itself, but also
the spiritual form.
Slowly, under magnetic
influence, the chromatin
fragments are fixed,
organizing the
chromosomes in which the
vital formulas of
reproduction would be
condensed. Multiple
processes of division
begin to be experienced.5
It also shows that
plants and animals,
after an internship in
the spiritual plane,
when they return to the
physical plane, through
the reincarnation
mechanism, become
elements of
transformation:
Plants and animals
domesticated by human
intelligence for
millennia can be
acclimatized and
improved there for
certain periods of
existence, at the end of
which they return to
their nuclei of origin
in the terrestrial soil.
Thus, they can advance
in the evolutionary
journey, compensated
with valuable
acquisitions of
refinement, through
which the Earth's usual
flora and fauna help,
with the benefits of
so-called spontaneous
mutations.6
In addition, he presents
this illuminating
thought:
The physical plane is
the cradle of evolution
that the extraphysical
plane improves. The
first breathes the
breath of life, whose
buildings the second
perfects. Reincarnation
multiplies experiences,
adding them up little by
little.7
We can deduce, from the
above, that the
interference of the
Spirits accustomed to
the evolution of the
Earth took place in
fundamental moments of
the planetary evolution,
where, using deep
technical knowledge,
they operated in the
genome of the living
beings, when in the due
moment, so that the
progress was
satisfactory.
A criticism that could
be made to the spiritist
proposal refers to the
disappearance of
millions of species. If
superior spirits
directed the process,
how can we understand
the emergence of animal
forms that should not
prevail over the years?
It is necessary to
understand that the
evolution of the
spiritual principle on
Earth has been a process
of creative
construction, in which
the intelligent
principle itself
participates, as an
organizing field of form
and storehouse of
acquired conquests, and
an innumerable phalanx
of disembodied Spirits,
certainly with
specialties in different
areas of knowledge, but
also in the process of
growth. The work of
these Spirits must be
considered as
evolutionary experiences
for them as well. They
are probably at an
advanced stage of
progress, but still
lacking development in
specific sectors of
evolution. This is how
processes or situations
that seem wrong to us
are justified, but which
are exercises and
experiences of
incomplete souls.
It is also necessary to
consider the needs of
the spiritual principle
in evolutionary transit.
Ready and complete
structures would not be
the substrate on which
the necessary
development would take
place.
In addition, the
limitations of the orb
itself need to be
considered. Emmanuel,
examining the question
of the monstrous tests
that gave rise to the
hideous animals of the
primitive ages,
remembers that the
cellular machine was
perfected, in the limit
of the possible, in face
of the physical laws of
the globe.8
In summary:
- Planner spirits are
not perfect and may have
their limitations
(competent scientists
often make mistakes).
- The action takes place
via still immature
energy fields (incapable
of fixing the most
complex systems).
- The limits imposed by
the physical, chemical
and biological laws of
the planet and planetary
evolution
- The need for gradual
elaboration of the
intelligent principle.
___________________
1 The
problem of the being,
chap. IX,
part 1
2 Thr
problem of the being, chap.
XII, part I
3 From
Conscious to unconscious
4 The
Comforter, item 6
5 Evolution
in two worlds, part 1,
chap VII. 8th edition. Brasilia:
FEB, 1958.
6 Evolution
in two worlds, part
I, chap. XIII. 8th. ed. Brasília:
FEB,1958.
7 Idem
8 On
the path to light, chap.
2.