|
Jorge Hessen |
|
Party ideology
x
Doctrine of
Spirits |
The legacy of
doctrinal
tolerance must
not express
itself in the
form of omission
regarding
conceptual
amendments and
abnormal ideas
that some
companions want
to introduce in
the doctrinal
institutions on
behalf of
political
activism. Mainly
if it is just
before
elections, when
discussions
arise about
whether the
Spiritist should
or not apply to
any elective
office.
In fact, the
Doctrine of
Spirits does not
encourage
engagement in
political
functions.
Moreover, it
does not allow
the use of its
tribune for
party propaganda
of any
candidate. The
main mission and
purpose of the
Spiritist is to
change his inner
self, his
behavior,
struggling to be
a good person on
behalf of the
Gospel. This
does not mean
that the
Spiritists are
unrelated to
political
issues. Whoever
thinks this is
wrong. The
incorruptible
Spiritists,
loyal to family,
to society and
moral
commitments are
fully active
citizens, who
exercise their
right and/or
obligation
(according to
the point of
view) to vote.
However, they do
it free from any
involvement in
the absurd
ideological-party
disputes.
If a Spiritist
belongs to any
political party,
and wishes to
run as a
candidate for
elective office,
obviously, he is
completely free
to do so.
However, he must
act away from
the Spiritist
environments, so
that he does not
disguise his
intention and
works within the
Spiritist
Institution with
the masked
purpose of
winning votes
among those who
attend the
meetings.
Excessive
caution is
recommended in
this case. It is
not a matter of
prejudice. It is
even a matter of
logic, since, if
issues of human
politics are
discussed, it is
not acceptable
to bring into
Spiritism, the
party ideology
(the "right",
"left",
"center", "both"
and so on).
Although, as a
citizen, every
Spiritist has
the right and
free will to
service within
the fragmented
universe of the
political and
party
ideologies, he
also has no
right to mix up
things. Let us
not forget that
Spiritism is not
a fragment of
worldly policy,
nor does it
engage with
sectarian
political groups
that use
contradictory
means to reach
power.
As we have seen,
for obvious
reasons, it is
imperative to
distinguish the
interest of
human politics,
with no value
whatsoever, and
the sublime
politics of
Jesus - the
"True light that
enlightens every
man” (1).
When we work to
eradicate
poverty and
social
exclusion, we
are adopting the
policy "of the
One who is from
the beginning”
(2).
The true
Spiritist policy
favors the human
being and his
spiritual
growth. A
conscious
Spiritist does
not submit nor
does he omit
himself before
the political
power. Moreover,
he is not
"opposition" or
"situation".
"The sincere
disciple of the
Gospel has no
need to breathe
the atmosphere
of the world's
politics to
fulfill the
ministry that is
committed to
him. The
Governor of
Earth to meet
the purpose of
the politics of
love,
represented,
above all, the
interests of God
in our hearts
with no need for
regulations and
decrees,
although they
may be
acceptable"(3).
Bezerra and
Euripedes
The first
chapter of the
Statute of the
Parisian Society
of Spiritist
Studies provides
the following
BAN (yes, BAN!):
"POLITICAL
ISSUES,
RELIGIOUS
CONTROVERSY, AND
SOCIAL ECONOMY
ARE PROHIBITED".
Therefore, based
on fair grounds,
it is
unacceptable for
someone to use
the Spiritist
tribune to make
political-party
propaganda.
Likewise, it is
a depressing
situation for a
Spiritist to use
an electoral
platform to
implore for
votes, using
demagogical
fallacies and
pretending to be
"modest,"
"poor,"
"humble,"
"altruist,"
"tolerant,"
glorifying his
unparalleled
"virtues" and
colossal works
of "charity". We
advise these
inconsiderate "Spiritists",
imploring for
votes, to keep a
distance from
Spiritism and
follow another
faith thus
assuring that
the Spiritist
movement does
not become
contaminated by
the cheap and
petty politics
of personal
interests.
Some defenders
of the
politicization
in Spiritist
centers remember
Menezes and
Euripides
Barsanulfo in
order to justify
their reasoning.
The political
career of
Menezes began in
1861, when he
was elected
municipal
councilor for
the Liberal
Party. He was
re-elected for
the period
1864-1868 and
was elected
Deputy General
in 1867. Again,
he was elected
city council man
in 1873. He
became Mayor,
which currently
corresponds to
the Mayor of Rio
de Janeiro, from
July 1878 to
January 1881.
During this
period, Bezerra
joined the
Abolitionism
struggle.
However, Bezerra
used extreme
caution in
dealing with the
matter.
Meanwhile, on
August 16, 1886,
the audience of
two thousand
people who
crowded the hall
of honor of the
Old Guard, in
Rio de Janeiro,
listened, in
silent and
astonishment,
the famous
physician and
politician
announcing his
conversion to
Spiritism. From
then onwards, he
did not involve
himself in
politics.
As for Euripides
Barsanulfo, he
was a
respectable
political
representative
of his
community, no
doubt. He became
the secretary of
the Brotherhood
of St. Vincent
de Paul, having
actively
participated in
the foundation
of the newspaper
"Gazeta
Sacramento" and
"High School
Sacramentano".
Soon he found
himself raised
to the natural
position of
leadership, for
his safe
guidance towards
the real values
of life.
Through
information
passed to him by
one of his
uncles, he
learned about
the existence of
spiritual
phenomena and
the works of the
Spiritist
Codification. In
view of these
facts, he
completely
turned his
activities to
the new
doctrine,
searching to
clarify all his
doubts. From
that moment, the
political party
ceased to be an
integral part of
the desires of
the young man
born in the
State of Minas
Gerais.
We do not need
political
representatives
Very strong
reasons compel
us to make an
important
distinction
between Spiritsm
and politics. We
are "political"
since we were
born. Yes, we
are, so what?
Spiritism can
never be a
vehicle for our
particular
ambitions. If
the world spins
around economic,
administrative
and social
policies, there
is no way to
tolerate
militancy within
Spiritism. The
simplest theory
cannot be
sustained when
we say that by
effectively
participating in
political
processes we
will improve the
world. This is
an ideological
foolishness.
In no way can we
mistake our
earthly politics
of minor
interests with
the policy of
the "Son of God”(4).
Each situation
has its proper
dimension. Party
politics belongs
to politicians,
while the
Spiritist
practice belongs
to the Christian
Spiritists. The
argument that
the Congressman
uses that being
in politics he
can more easily
"defend" the
principles of
the Doctrine, or
entice social
prestige to
Spiritism, or
even being a
"light" among
lawmakers, is an
artful and
dishonest
argument. "WE
HAVE NO NEED OF
OFFICIAL
REPRESENTATIVES
OF SPIRITISM IN
NO SECTOR OF
HUMAN POLICY""(5).
The genuine
Spiritist
scholars
understand that
life is to be
lived based on
common sense and
humbleness. They
understand that
"the mission of
the doctrine is
to comfort and
instruct, in
Jesus, so that
all mobilize
their divine
possibilities
into the way
they live. To
change this for
a place at the
banquet of the
States is to
reverse the
value of the
teachings,
because all
human
organizations
are transient
due to the need
for renewal of
all formulas of
man in the law
of universal
progress"(6).
Again, we
guarantee that
that there is no
basis for the
useless
arguments that
only by
participating in
political
processes, we
can help to
"improve"
Brazil. Let us
not forget that
the "King of the
Ages”(7)
thought much to
improve creature
itself. It is
not reported
that the "Son of
God”(8)
opened any
political party
proceedings
against or in
favor of the
established
power at the
time. So our
nonpolitical
conduct
(nonpartisan)
should not be
seen as
conformism; on
the contrary,
this attitude is
synonym of
industrious
patience, always
working to
improve the
situation and
cooperate with
those who are
given the
responsibility
of managing our
public
interests.
It is right to
remember that
through
imperceptible
consents, we
mischaracterize
the program of
the Third
Revelation.
Under the title
of tolerance,
many times we
become blind to
the
politicization
in Spiritist
centers.
However,
experience shows
that, sometimes,
we can even
close an eye,
but never both
of them.
Considering that
our world is the
home of opinion,
it is natural
that we disagree
with our fellow
political
activists
regarding this
specific
subject.
However, what is
inadmissible, in
view of the
proper
orientation of
the Spiritist
Doctrine, is the
imposition that
arises involving
those who
mistake
intensity with
aggressiveness,
or defense of
truth with
inflexibility.
We are invested
of an immediate
commitment,
rather than
delve into the
world of
politics
saturated by
deplorable
misconceptions.
Therefore, we
should not seek
a prominent
position for
ourselves in the
transitional
government of
the Earth. If we
are called upon
by
circumstances,
we must accept
it, not for the
honor of the
doctrine we
profess, but as
a complex
experience,
where every
success is
always very
difficult. "The
sincere
Spiritist must
understand that
enlightenment of
a consciousness
is as if it were
the
enlightenment of
a world. We
emphasize that
the task of the
Gospel,
regarding the
embodied souls
on Earth, is the
most important
of all, since it
constitutes a
definite and
real
realization. The
purpose of the
Doctrine is to
comfort and
teach Jesus, so
that all
mobilize their
divine
possibilities in
the way of life.
To change it for
a place at the
banquet of
States is to
reverse the
value of the
teachings,
because all
human
organizations
are transient
due to the need
for renewal of
all formulas of
the man in the
law of universal
progress."(9)
Conclusion
If we lived in a
society educated
for mutual
tolerance,
respect for
authority, for
the persistent
work without
conflicts
between servers
and government,
employers and
employees, where
people came
together to
understand the
need of
individual or
social group
spiritual
values, then we
would live in a
blissful and
peaceful
country. Many
can admire
politics as a
science, as a
principle, as a
philosophy, but,
certainly, we do
not need to
engage in
political
parties. We
think in being
fair to fight
for our
voluntary action
in society,
whether in our
professional
action, whether
acting as a
citizen, without
changing our
dignity by
politics or
personal
convenience.
References:
1 John
1:9
2 1 John
2:13
3 Xavier,
Francisco
Candido.
Vineyard Light (Vinha
da Luz),
dictated by the
Spirit Emmanuel,
Rio de Janeiro:
Ed BSF (FEB)
1999, Chapter 59
4 Luke
1:32
5 VIEIRA,
Waldo.
Spiritist
Conduct (Conduta
Espirita),
dictated by the
Spirit Andre
Luiz,
Rio de Janeiro:
BSF (FEB), 2001
Chapter 10
6 Xavier,
Francisco
Candido. The
Comforter (O
Consolador),
dictated by the
Spirit
Emmanuel, Rio de
Janeiro: Ed BSF
(FEB) 1984,
Question 60
7 1
Timothy 1:17
8 Mt 2:15
9 Xavier,
Francisco
Candido. The
Comforter
(O Consolador),
dictated by the
Spirit
Emmanuel, Rio de
Janeiro: Ed BSF
(FEB) 1984,
Question 60.
|