data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90fa9/90fa93171a2fd1994b0c30d9c58f8f819ee3d6c2" alt="" |
Guilt, regret
and repair under
the Spiritist
perspective
Part
2 and final
|
Claudia
Gelernter |
Today, the issue
of guilt has
become even more
extensive,
according to the
current
ideology. In
Capitalism, we
are guilty if we
don’t accumulate
capital. Failure
consists of not
being successful
in business, in
studies, in
consuming. For
women, it’s more
than that:
failures are the
ones who cannot
keep up with the
standard of
beauty spread by
the ever-so
skinny catwalk
models.
Jean-Yves Leloup,
the French
priest, author
of the book
“Normosis, the
Pathology of
Normality”
created an
interesting
concept to
define today’s
context. He
called
“normosis” all
that is socially
accepted as
being normal,
but,
nevertheless,
causes suffering
or even death.
Shallow
relationships,
exacerbated
consumerism, the
quest for the
ideal standard
of beauty, for
success, for
power, etc.,
makes a
noticeable part
of population
suffer,
generating
symptoms of
difficult
solution. We are
guilty of not
achieving our
set goals,
within this
pattern of
current normosis.
And, in order to
disguise the
guilt, we wear
social masks
that make us
seem. We seem
not to make
mistakes, we
seem to own, we
seem to be. But
we only seem. We
all make
mistakes, we own
nothing (once
that all belongs
to God and can
be taken away at
any moment) and,
in this way, we
don’t even have
the knowledge of
who we really
are.
We emphasize
that, if on the
one hand we have
the issue of
guilt as a
social product,
on the other
hand it is not
less true that
we have had, for
over two
thousand years,
other ways of
thinking that
bring a
reflection about
the situation of
the affection to
matter and the
negligence with
the questions of
the Spirit.
Therefore,
although we are
immersed in a
remarkable and
oppressive
ideology,
there’s no lack
of philosophical
and religious
options in this
context for us
to analyze our
behavior in the
world and its
possible
consequences.
Remorse as a
mechanism of
self-punishment
Guilt is the
consequence of a
mistake which
caused some harm
(either material
or moral) to
oneself or to
others. The
awareness of
such mistake
causes us to
suffer. And such
feeling can be
experienced in
two ways:
healthily or
pathologically.
Let’s call a
healthy guilt
the one that
leads us to a
sincere regret
and that,
although dressed
as pain, propels
one to
reparation.
In the core of
the word, regret
means a change
of attitude,
that is, a
contrary
attitude, or
opposed to the
one taken
previously. It
stems from the
Greek
metanoia
(meta=change,
noia=in this
way). Regret
means,
therefore, a
change of
mentality.
We have then, in
the healthy
process, first
the diagnosis of
the mistake.
Without this,
it’s impossible
to go on without
accumulating
more debts.
People who have
their
consciousness
dormant, when
waking up, face
harder pains,
accumulated due
to their
spiritual
blindness. It’s
worth mentioning
that no son is
at the margin of
the Love of the
Heavenly Father.
We all are, in
different
occasions and in
various
contexts, in
touch with the
truths of the
Greater World.
Good will must
be present,
otherwise we
risk sliding off
the evolutionary
road more than
necessary,
gathering pains
along the way.
There must be a
sincere regret.
That is, a
change of
mentality. We
diagnose the
mistake and no
longer wish to
make it.
However, we
won’t just
struggle not to
repeat the evil.
We’ll go beyond:
in the third
(and essential)
step, we’ll move
towards
reparation.
Allan Kardec, in
the book
Heaven and Hell,
in the penal
code of future
life, states
that “regret, as
long as being
the first step
towards
regeneration, is
not enough in
itself;
expiation and
reparation are a
must. (…)
Regret,
expiation and
reparation
constitute,
therefore, the
three conditions
necessary in
order to erase
the traces of a
fault and its
consequences”.
In the
pathological
guilt we have,
as a result,
just remorse, in
a closed circuit
type of
thinking, in
which one
believes
(wrongly) that,
when feeling a
repeated pain,
one is paying
for the mistakes
he’s made and
redeeming his
debts. Sad
illusion, in
which the person
who suffers
stays in a state
of hypnosis,
self inflicting
pain, without
being able to
set himself free
or evolve.
We have here a
process of
evolutionary
freeze, a
psychological
deadlock that
leads to serious
pathologies of
the mind and the
body if not
treated in time.
In remorse the
subject locks
himself up in
his pain,
howling,
believing that
he’s not worth
of anything
good, giving up
the fight to
repair and free
himself. He
cannot realize
the role of
mistake and pain
in his own
evolution,
getting stuck in
tormented
waters, in a
never-ending and
senseless
suffering.
Remorse makes
him suffer, but
does not set him
free. The person
feels
comfortable with
complaining and
whining.
Psychologically
more mature,
he’d move
towards
self-forgiveness
and reparation.
Many lives and
unconscious
guilt
With the arrival
of Spiritualism,
we acquired
important
knowledge, such
as
reincarnation.
We learned
through it, that
we experience
successive
existences, in
an evolutionary
continuum, in
which
experiences
appear as
precious tools,
propelling to
constant
improvement. In
this process,
pain can be
compared to a
fever in the
organic vessel,
which warns
about an
infectious
problem that
needs to be
diagnosed in
order to be
treated. In the
soul, pain plays
the important
role of warning
us about
something that
is going well in
the moral realm.
We must escape
the prosecution
state in which
we find
ourselves in,
seeing pain as
an enemy. Very
much on the
contrary, it
must be deemed
as an
opportunity for
knowledge, for
understanding
ourselves,
enabling a real
intimate
improvement.
What happens is
that, addicted
to this ‘evil
suffering’, we
go on
accumulating
regrets,
distancing
ourselves from
the higher
objective, which
is to learn from
our mistakes,
repairing them
and moving on,
free.
We continue
accumulating in
our unconscious
psyche emotions
related to
pathological
guilt, carrying,
to other lives,
problems of
difficult
solutions.
Neurotic
syndromes may be
closely related
to those past
memories, but
not accessible
to our
consciousness.
For instance:
the horrible
fear that some
people show when
put in a
position of
leadership may
reflect mistakes
of the past,
when they needed
to deal with the
experience of
having power and
failed, due to
their arrogant,
abusive or
untimely
personalities.
The
Spiritualistic
Doctrine helps
us
extraordinarily
in the
understanding or
all this
process, for it
reveals the
anteriority of
the Being, where
in many
instances reside
the disorders of
today. We begin
to understand
ourselves as
lords of our
actions and
tend, therefore,
to change.
Freeing
ourselves from
the pathological
regret and
learning to live
more
responsibly.
What about those
who have just
entered
Spiritualism?
Another point
that we would
like to mention
are the
newcomers, the
ones who enter
the
Spiritualistic
Doctrine and
start drinking
from its
fountains. They
soon realize the
grandiosity of
its revealing
message and in
many cases get
scared and dodge
learning more,
frightened by
the possibility
of never
achieving its
teachings.
Others, who
persist longer,
but still don’t
grasp the
message in all
its extension,
begin a complex
process of
self-punishment,
suffering
extensively a
pain that
originates from
a complicated
past.
One example:
people who use
drugs (even the
‘so-called’
legal ones),
when they learn
what happens to
your spiritual
body (perispirit),
may start to
experience huge
intimate
difficulties.
We need to be
aware that it
does not matter
the size of the
problem or
mistake, but our
healthy endeavor
in the choices
we make today
will pay off in
the future.
We are no longer
in control of
what we have
done. This
belongs to the
past. But we may
control our own
future, which
really depends
on us alone.
Mistakes help us
deeply to
understand the
paths we should
follow. They are
rather important
for our
evolution.
Certain choices
would not make
any sense for
us, if we don’t
understand why.
Faith must be
rationalized. We
must know why we
need to change,
how to change
and when. And
even IF we
cannot reform
ourselves in
certain aspects,
what we learn is
that we must try
again and again…
seventy times
seven, if that’s
necessary…
What if we don’t
have the
opportunity to
repair the harm
we’ve done to a
certain person
directly?
Let’s try not to
repeat the same
mistake and love
deeply. The
Apostle Peter
said that “Love
covers over a
multitude of
sins” (Peter,
4:8). That’s it.
Let’s remember
that from the
mistake of
Rousseau and
Mary of Magdala
wonderful fruit
have sprung.
Although not
receiving direct
reparation with
the ones harmed
in that
incarnation (in
the case of
Rousseau, the
five children
abandoned by
him), both opted
by the exercise
of unselfish
love and by
doing so left a
beautiful and
important legacy
which, if
observed and put
into action,
helps us in our
journey, freeing
us from remorse,
propelling us to
making it right,
to the good
path, according
to what already
pointed us, two
thousand years
ago, Jesus, the
Master by
excellence.
Even if we have
to wait a longer
time to have the
opportunity to
repair directly,
let’s not doubt
that,
strengthened by
love in action,
we will be able
to overcome our
intimate
barriers, and
turn ourselves,
at last, into
benefactors of
not only those,
but the many
others who cross
our paths.
Bibliographical
References:
LELOUP: J. Y;
WEILL, P.;
CREMA, R.
Normose: a
patologia da
normalidade. São
Paulo, Thot,
1997.
KARDEC, A. O Céu
e o Inferno,
Código da Vida
Futura, p.94,
Tradução de
Manuel
Justiniano
Quintão, 42ª
edição; FEB; Rio
de Janeiro,
1998.
O
Livro dos
Espíritos, 1ª
edição
comemorativa do
sesquicentenário,
Tradução de
Evandro Noleto
Bezerra, FEB,
Rio de Janeiro,
2006.
ROUSSEAU, J.J.;
Emílio ou Da
Educação;
tradução Roberto
Leal Ferreira,
3ª edição, São
Paulo, Martins
Fontes, 2004.
WEBER, Max. A
Ética
Protestante e o
Espírito do
Capitalismo. São
Paulo, Martin
Claret. 4ª
edição, 2001.
XAVIER, F.C.;
Boa Nova,
capítulo Maria
de Magdala, pelo
Espírito
Humberto de
Campos; FEB; 3ª
edição, Rio de
Janeiro, 2008.
|