|
Rogério Coelho |
|
The prohibition
of Moses
Every reason
alleged to
condemn
communication
with the Spirits
does not stand
up to serious
scrutiny |
(Part 2 and
Final)
When presenting
himself before
Jesus, along
with Elijah on
Mount Tabor,
Moses revoked
the ban on
communication
with the dead.
- François C.
Liran
(1)
Allan Kardec
explains in the
introduction to
"The Book of
the Spirits"
and in issue
459: "(...) the
action of
Spirits is
constant over
the moral and
physical world
too. They act
over matter and
thinking and
constitute one
of the powers of
Nature, the main
cause of many
phenomena not
explained
before, or
poorly
explained, and
for which we
only find a
reasonable
definition in
Spiritism.
Communication
between Spirits
and human beings
is constant. The
Good Spirits
influence us to
do good, sustain
us in our trials
in life, and
give us courage
and resignation.
The evil urge us
to do evil: they
are happy to see
us give in and,
therefore, be
like them.
Communications
between Spirits
and men are
secret or open.
The first are
seen in the good
or bad influence
they exercise
over us, and of
which we are not
even aware.
However, it is
our
responsibility
to judge and
separate the
wheat from the
chaff, i.e., to
know the
difference
between the good
and bad
influences. The
open
communications
happen through
writing, speech
or other
physical
manifestations,
most of the
times through
mediums used by
the Spirits as
their
instruments.
Spirits manifest
themselves
spontaneously or
when evoked. One
can evoke all
spirits: those
who lived as
common persons,
and those who
were famous,
whatever the
period in which
they lived.
Those who were
our relatives,
friends, or
enemies, and
obtain from
them, by means
of written or
verbal
communications,
advice,
information
about their
situation in
afterlife, what
they think about
us as well as
the messages
they are allowed
to pass to us.
It is easy to
distinguish a
good from a bad
Spirit
-
Spirits approach
the environment
in which they
are being evoked
according to its
moral. High
Spirits are
pleased to be in
serious
meetings, where
goodness and a
sincere desire
of those who are
present to
improve prevail.
Their presence
makes inferior
Spirits
withdraw.
Inversely, the
inferior Spirits
turn up and have
free access
working among
futile and
curious persons,
and where a
great number of
evil instincts
can be seen. Far
from giving us
good advice and
worthy
information, we
can only expect
peddling,
untruths,
distasteful
jokes, or
mystification,
because they
often present
themselves using
respected names
in order to
better induce us
to error.
It is extremely
easy to
distinguish a
good from a bad
Spirit. High
Spirits always
use a dignified
and gentle
language, based
on highest
moral, and free
from any
inferior
passion. Their
advice is full
of pure wisdom
with the purpose
of our
improvement and
for the good of
humanity. On the
contrary, the
language of the
Lower Spirits is
inconsistent,
commonplace, and
coarse. They
mock the
unreasonable
credulity and
amuse themselves
with those who
question them,
by flattering
their vanity,
and feeding
their fantasies
with false hope.
In short,
serious
communication,
in the broadest
sense of the
term, only
occurs in
serious centers
where thoughts
are shared and
the practice of
good is the main
purpose."
It is immature
to prejudge
mediumship
– Probably those
who still
condemn the
communication
with the Spirits
have a lot to
lose by not
being aware of
the information
they give us.
Fiercely holding
on to rusty
dogmas they
profess (but
seldom
practice), they
do not accept
their
"status-quo"
to be changed
and stick to
their ignorance
and mental
limitation in
which they
delight
themselves not
acknowledging
the broader
insights that
the
communication of
Superior Spirits
provide. Says
Herminio C.
Miranda:
(2)
"Bias against
manifestations
of the soul
afterlife
reflects a
pathetic
intellectual
limitation,
considering the
enormous amount
of information
presently
cumulated by
specialized
sciences. One
can still accept
researchers who
are blocked by
their
materialistic
concepts and who
obstinately
continue to deny
these
manifestations
of the soul
afterlife.
However, it is
difficult to
understand and
accept the
theologians, who
are ultimately
spokesmen of
their religious
communities and
who let
themselves be
intimidated and
refuse to
examine evidence
and reject it
with no appeal.
Mainly because
these
communications
are
characterized at
least nominally,
as
spiritualists,
i.e., they are
structured on
the concept that
the human being
is, basically, a
Spirit, whatever
is its
afterlife. Or,
we shall arrive
at the following
masterpiece of
sophistication:
I believe in
a spiritual
principle in the
human being. I
believe that
this principle
survives bodily
death (otherwise
religion would
not make sense),
but I do not
accept that this
spiritual
principle - soul
or spirit - can
exist, unless
coupled to the
physical body,
because
anthropology
does not agree
with that."
Concludes
Herminio C.
Miranda: "But
just because the
criterion
arbitrated by
anthropology
imposes, we must
accept it as a
starting point
to embark on new
theology mazes?
Placements such
as these may
even be
acceptable,
i.e.,
philosophical
and theological
formulations
cannot ignore
scientific
postulates or
contradict them,
but instead, it
is imperative
that we must be
convinced that
the scientific
and
anthropological
criteria, in
this case, are,
in fact, true,
tested,
unquestionable,
and therefore
acceptable.
Without this, we
have a mere
guess, like any
other. What does
the anthropology
of the spirit or
of the soul know
up to now? From
what we have
seen, it is
looking for the
soul in the
wrong place,
precisely
because it
already begins
the research
determined not
to find it,
decision
resulting from
another premise
no less
arbitrary and
personal - that
the soul cannot
exist, the more
survive and
communicate."
To the
orthodox-materialist
anthropologists
opposes the
unquestionable
message of the
Spirits on the
issue 459 of
"The Book of the
Spirits."
It is not
without reason
that Jesus
uttered the
famous words
recorded by
Lucas, in
Chapter 10,
verse 21, and
Kardec did not
exclude them
from the
Codification. In
good French, it
says the
following:
“Je te loue, ô
Père, Seigneur
du ciel et de la
terre, de ce que
tu as caché ces
choses aux sages
et aux
intelligents, et
de ce que tu les
as révélées aux
enfants!”
(3)
____________________
1
- Matthew 17:1
to 13.
2
- Miranda,
Herminio C.
Christianity:
The Forgotten
Message. 3.
ed. Matao: O CLARIM.
Chapter 5, 2nd
3
- I thank thee,
O Father, Lord
of heaven and
earth, that you
have hidden
these things
from the wise
and learned, and
revealed them to
little children!
|